Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (99140)	2/15/2000 6:53:00 PM
From: Harry Landsiedel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Amy J. Thanx for your post. Re: "m somewhat wondering why Intel didn't try a little harder to work things out with SUNW" My take on Intel is that probably did MANY times and have been stiffed. So they brought it out into the open, figuring being nice was not speaking the language SUNW could understand. Re: "Dell will be the low-cost provider for less innovative solutions" You are more knowledgeable than I so I defer. My point is that Dell got an order for 10,000 servers for Intel's server farms. Barrett's 3 part mantra: price/performance, freedom of choice and innovation fits with the Dell approach. This does not leave out CPQ, but it does challenge them on the price/performance issue doesn't it? Re:"SUNW doesn't own the Enterprise market and I think that is well-understood with Intel's top management." Again, I defer to your superior knowledge here. But doesn't SUNW's support for Itanium give Intel a big entre‚ into the enterprise? And wouldn't SUNW's weak support delay Intel's penetration into that space? HL