SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rudedog who wrote (27827)2/15/2000 5:11:00 PM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
JC - Cheryl is passionate about Unix...

Me too. It began for me with DOS BBSing. That's the experience I come from. I watched Windows fail miserably at living up to it's initial hype (and I really tried). Never mind multi-tasking, just dealing with a serial port was more than it could handle. Successively, it's been the same. With Win95 Microsoft actually sent shills into the network to advance Win95 over OS/2, and permanently establish in my mind what is the M$ style; what Microsoft branding is all about.

Meanwhile, back at the internet, Unix and open standards run the show, just as they do the telephone company. There's a reason the telephone company doesn't run VAX VMS. What half-truth or propaganda is there?

When the rest of the world was swallowing Microsoft's line about making a 'better Unix than Unix', and Scott McNealy was just laughing (alone) and pointing out that M$ made TOY operating systems, that had a certain resonance with me. I repositioned into SUNW in a big way. To me, the writing was on the wall, and it had a LOT to do with Unix.

Since then, I've become a bit of a *nix enthusiast. I'm continually enthralled with GNU/Linux being all of the things we were trying to turn our DOS boxes into back in the BBS days. There *isn't* a better Unix than Unix.

I don't read propaganda and half-truths from Cheryl. What I read mirrors my experience and more often than not accurately predicts an outcome. I don't understand the problem you have with Cheryl's posts.

-JCJ