Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LINUX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. K. G. who wrote (2160)	2/16/2000 1:09:00 AM
From: Rusty Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2617

Does Win2000 Really Matter? By Charles Babcock and Todd Spangler, Inter@ctive Week February 14, 2000 6:25 AM ET While Windows 2000 gestated for the past five years, the world of operating systems changed. One operating system that can fit all devices may well be as antiquated as the idea that mainframe computers can handle all computing tasks. ... To NetLedger's Durkee, the demanding nature of the Windows 2000 upgrade will itself speed a change away from Microsoft dominance of the business infrastructure. "The upheaval is causing people to re-evaluate what they're doing," he claimed. With his business based on hundreds of Linux servers linked together in a cluster, he believes businesses of all stripes will recognize the merit of the Apache Web server, Sendmail and other open source/free code on which much of the Internet runs. In effect, Windows begets its own alternatives. "Windows 2000 will generate a lot of excitement because of the huge Windows incumbancy. But as people look further down the road, they'll see how much it locks them in" to the Microsoft product line. One reason young Internet businesses don't go the Windows route, Durkee said, "is because they don't want to be locked in." zdnet.com Did Windows 2000 miss the revolution? news.excite.com Best of luck.