Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boplicity who wrote (6324)	2/15/2000 7:41:00 PM
From: t2	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 24042

A question for TA experts. Why is it bad if a stock is going downward on heavy volume? Why is it different if the downward move is on light volume? What if after a downward move, the volume stays heavy but the declines are less such as in the case of Microsoft. Can the steady price on high volume also mean great support at that price? TIA.

To: Boplicity who wrote (6324)	2/15/2000 11:53:00 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

Well, hypothetically, after I chatted with Arun Netravalli, I would have to decide if this was a real attempt at becoming part of the future. It is a stretch for a lot of folks in the telco paradigm. Altough I am beginning to get a sense that the ITU is losing ground to the IETF and to forces unknown (www.tachion.com). Most of the really bright InGinEars at LuLU know deep in their heart that bureaucracy is their enemy. That the pace of change and the possibility to use their minds to the best advantage are not in the bureaus of the past. Eg. IP v 5ESS, slam dunk. Your comments on SIFY would be appreciated. I have some friends who think their homeland is hellbent on destroying the future. Yet, SIFY is defying the odds. Please advise. YHCS, FOTH