Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buffettology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (2136)	2/16/2000 7:29:00 AM
From: cfimx	Respond to of 4691

> life is short As is the "smart" money on LHSP. It's a fraud. Kinda of like a guy like you pretending to be interested in anything Buffet (or we) has to say.

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (2136)	2/16/2000 10:29:00 AM
From: LauA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4691

jhg - even a stopped clock is right twice a day. You've never posted a value case for your fad stocks. Had you been to the Intel Developer's Conference in Palm Springs this week, you would have heard Intel talking about RMBS for the first time in 6 months. That's what's driving the stock. The MENTION, not the VALUE. Volume users are still Nintendo and Play Station. For me the value is in their patent dispute with Hitachi. Their memory structure looks to be a 3 year phenomenon limited to high end PC's/workstations. It's possible that Intel is using it as vaporware extension to their 1.5 GHz Williamette (sp). Downside is that several (perhaps all) memory makers are siding with Hitachi. AMD is NOT using it. MOT is NOT using it. IA-64 - unknown. L&H was interesting 3 years ago prior to the M$FT investment. It has NEVER been a value play. It appears to be an accounting play - hope and hype. My brief trial with one of its products 3 months ago was not good. jhg - do me a favor and post your estimates on intrinsic value for these two companies. Lau