Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waverider who wrote (67046)	2/16/2000 10:45:00 AM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Diamond H: Looks like we have busted through that green line thingie Nope, it is still holding serve, for now! Don't misinterpret a penetration as a break of the trend line... Regards, LG

To: waverider who wrote (67046)	2/16/2000 10:48:00 AM
From: Sawtooth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

<<has to do with the cross over of CDMA technical thingies multiplied by the "I want one of those" variables interacting with its combined division into the Swedish factor. Something from Nymph Caxton about the resulting "toast" syndrome>> I'm with you fully re:the formula up to the part about the Swedish nymphs. Can you provide more descriptive information, please? In the interest of the scientific approach to investing, of course. ; ) ......VVVVVVVVVVVV

To: waverider who wrote (67046)	2/16/2000 10:48:00 AM
From: Ritch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Rick - Your gibberish is not funny at all. Don't give up your day job for comedy. I wish you would stop all of the nonsense posts. This thread is not your private playground and some of us would appreciate it if you would stop wasting so much bandwidth. Thanks, Ritch

To: waverider who wrote (67046)	2/16/2000 11:11:00 AM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

You have to watch out when looking at LG charts he has them stretch out (shorter time frame) so the action looks large but if you were to look at them on longer time frame setting say a year a better picture would emerge. Still thanks much LG they are very clear. How about a long term setting? Greg

To: waverider who wrote (67046)	2/16/2000 12:36:00 PM
From: Ed Forrest	Respond to of 152472

<<How am I doing Ed? <H>>> I'll let this post answer that question.Perhaps if you visited the "Porch" would might stop obsessing about it so much. Just visit for a while and you may learn to lighten up a bit.:) <<To: +Diamond H (67047 ) From: +Ritch Wednesday, Feb 16 2000 10:47AM ET Reply # of 67066 Rick - Your gibberish is not funny at all. Don't give up your day job for comedy. I wish you would stop all of the nonsense posts. This thread is not your private playground and some of us would appreciate it if you would stop wasting so much bandwidth. Thanks, Ritch>>

To: waverider who wrote (67046)	2/16/2000 12:36:00 PM
From: Ed Forrest	Respond to of 152472

<<How am I doing Ed? <H>>> I'll let this post answer that question.Stop obsessing about the "Porch" and just visit for a while and you may learn to lighten up a bit.:) <<To: +Diamond H (67047 ) From: +Ritch Wednesday, Feb 16 2000 10:47AM ET Reply # of 67066 Rick - Your gibberish is not funny at all. Don't give up your day job for comedy. I wish you would stop all of the nonsense posts. This thread is not your private playground and some of us would appreciate it if you would stop wasting so much bandwidth. Thanks, Ritch>>