Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William C. Spaulding who wrote (37249)	2/16/2000 3:50:00 PM
From: Jdaasoc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

WCS: From looking at your long winded profile, which I suggest the thread take a look see, you have not posted on this thread since SEP 28, the day I bought RMBS for 59 dollars. My cost is now 36 dollars cheaper with the covered calls I wrote today so I do not care about your warnings. However you 6 month old short FUD could surely need a update. Since you left, RMBS filed suit against Hitachi claiming that DDR and more importantly SDRAM infringed on it's patents. In addition, our new marketing guy at RMBS, Avo, is letting everyone know that concurrent Rambus RAM that came out for the Nintendo 64 in 1995 was the first type of syncronous (sic) DRAM on the market which RMBS filed for patents in 1990 even before PC66 SDRAM. So it just may be that Hitachi may have problems in court with just plain SDRAM not to mention DDR. Please revise your short FUD and get back to us RMBS longs. john

To: William C. Spaulding who wrote (37249)	2/16/2000 4:03:00 PM
From: Steve Lee	Respond to of 93625

Well imagine you were a hard disk manufacturer and you owned the patent for ATA

To: William C. Spaulding who wrote (37249)	2/16/2000 4:03:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

William, when do you expect DDR to arrive on the scene? I believe that Sony decided it is too "unstable". You think that RMBS had problems with "terminations" and interfacing chip sets, just watch the problems surfacing once DDR is asked to perform at 800 MHz. Zeev