Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3993)	2/16/2000 7:06:00 PM
From: w molloy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5195

Bux, you must pride yourself in your ability to overinterpret and distort. I have rarely visited Bill Dalglish' site and frankly never read what I was supposed to have said until posted here. Are you serious? Most people would have a BIG problem being quoted extensively without permission. When I read the site, I assumed you had actively contributed. Regarding Bux's advice regarding litigation from sour IDC share holders, you should take it seriously. If IDC heads south, Dalglishes website could be held suspect of boosterism, despite the legalese he quotes about doing your own DD etc. You could be dragged in despite your protestations of innocence, especially if you don't do anything about the quotes after being warned. w.

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3993)	2/16/2000 7:38:00 PM
From: Bux	Respond to of 5195

I have rarely visited Bill Dalglish' site and frankly never read what I was supposed to have said until posted here. Nevertheless, I do not see a significant problem with how Bill worded this, although, I personally would not have worded what I supposedly said in the same manner. You could clear this up right now. How did you word the part that discusses the applicability of the '94 agreement to 3G? your practiced means of distortion, overkill and veiled threats, does warrant further examination. Well, I think people who have stuck this silly thread out this long have a pretty good idea where the overkill and distortion are coming from. But if I had made veiled threats, that would concern me. Please cut and paste these "veiled threats" for further examination as you claim they deserve. I don't know why I get the feeling there will be no cutting and pasting happening. Probably because every time I have asked you to cut and paste an example of my inaccuracies, lies, untruths and exaggerations so we can all see what you are talking about there is only silence. I wait and wait but they never appear. I guess you have enough time to invent the silly allegations but you're too busy to provide any examples of what you are talking about. Since I don't want to wait for something that history tells me will never show, I'll take the liberty to post the only thing I think you could be refering to: If things go bad for IDC and shares drop, there might be a whole slew of investor suits. I wouldn't be surprised if you were named in them. That is just one reason of many why you should make sure you are not misleading new investors. After all, you are identified as a "telecom tech investment expert Darrell Smith", this is the things lawsuits are made of. That's not a "veiled threat" Darrell. First, "veiled threat" implies an illegal retaliation. There is nothing illegal about threatening to sue if certain steps are not taken. I don't hold IDC shares so I would not be bringing suit anyway, I was giving you what I perceive to be valuable advice. If you paid an attorney who specializes in identifying liability problems, you would probably get the exact same advice and probably much more. You can't be too careful when promoting a stock especially when you are identified as a "telecom investment expert". The website you appear on is highly unusual in that its entire purpose appears to be the hyping of a single security. In all my years of researching investments I don't think I have ever run across a similar site hyping another security. I also think Bill Dalglish (the site owner) is incurring at least as much liability as you. Again, that's not a threat to Bill, but a helpful warning. I don't think the legal disclaimers on the site will offer much in the way of protection if disgruntled IDC shareholders file suit. By the way, IDC has often threatened to sue if they don't get what they are asking for. Does that make them guilty of "veiled threats"? Sincerely, Bux