SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : IFLO is Breaking Out -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sergio H who wrote (817)2/17/2000 12:36:00 AM
From: FastC6  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1018
 
They gain nothing from it....just one less competitive product on the market.

It is the PC2000 that is doing the IFLO butt kicking.

. .



To: Sergio H who wrote (817)2/17/2000 7:27:00 AM
From: Carole  Respond to of 1018
 
Interesting ... especially the "delivery of pain relief " blurb
biz.yahoo.com
Thursday February 17, 2:47 am Eastern Time

CORRECTED - Investment bankers hungry for
biotechnology deals
In NEW YORK story on Feb 16 headlined ''Investment bankers hungry for biotechnology
deals'', please read in paragraph 3: ''...said Taylor Crouch, president and chief executive of
privately held Variagenics Inc.'' (Corrects name and company of executive)

Also, please read in paragraph 4: ''Crouch believes the biggest challenge for the biotcech
sector...''

(all figures in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted)

By Ian Karleff

NEW YORK, Feb 16 (Reuters) - When North American biotechnology firms went begging investment bankers for funds six
months ago they got the cold shoulder. Now they're running out of ways to politely turn down the money.

The recent surge in biotech stocks, widely believed to be a result of those who profited from Internet shares looking for the
next high-flying sector, has created a seemingly insatiable appetite in the investment community for companies selling hope.

''The baby boomers made money on the Internet and now they want to live forever,'' said Taylor Crouch, president and chief
executive of privately held Variagenics Inc.

Crouch believes the biggest challenge for the biotech industry is to live up to all the recent research excitement, which could
take years to materialize into actual drugs.

''We have to manage expectations so as not to disappoint,'' he said.

''Investors are throwing money at the sector and making money doing it,'' Eric Roberts, a managing director of Warburg Dillon
Read's health care group, told a packed luncheon at this year's BIO CEO Investor conference in New York.

Interest in the sector is booming, with over 1200 attendees at this year's conference compared with 500 last year and 200 the
year before.

So far in 2000, at least 12 U.S. companies, mostly in the hot field of genomics, have filed for initial public offerings, said
Roberts.

Chase Hambrecht & Quist, a leading U.S. investment banker in the biotech sector, underwrote more than $15 billion in the
sector in the first 41 days of 2000, compared with a total of $20 billion in 1999 and seven to eight billion per year in the
mid-1990s.

And the fever has quickly spread north of the U.S. border where Canadian biotech companies report fending off a barrage of
requests from bankers trying to fulfill institutional demands for biotech shares.

''The demand for biotech products is humongous,'' said Normand Balthazard, chief executive of healthcare investment fund
BioCapital Investments in Montreal.

Even stocks of more questionable quality are seeing their valuations rise as retail investors rush into the sector, and soon those
same investors will be screaming for new stories in the form of initial public offerings, said Balthazard.

''You will see IPOs come to market this year with $100 million in valuation that will seem cheap compared to those that have
gone public and are now valued at $500 million,'' added Balthazard.

He expects to see close to a dozen Canadian biotech IPOs this year, a vast improvement over only one in each of 1998 and
1999.

Canadian IPOs to watch out for in 2000 include Cryocath Inc., Quantum Biotechnologies, GlycoDesign Inc., Neurochem Inc.,
RTP Pharma Inc., MethylGene Inc. and Conjuchem Inc. -- all of which Balthazard boasts are in his portfolio.

Some companies are feeling pressured to go public today, because they fear missing the money train that could pull out of the
station with little warning.

''We are being pushed,'' said Duffy DuFresne, president and chief executive of private Conjuchem.

DuFresne told Reuters that he faces a difficult conundrum: take advantage of the current demand for biotech issues, which
could dilute management's focus during a time when his company is in the midst of pivotal clinical trials. Or hold off going public
for a year, at which point trial data could lend credibility to the company's story, although funding could potentially have dried
up.

''It's not just the investment banks, or investors pushing us, it's ourselves. We want to temper that push but don't want to hurt
the company,'' said DuFresne.

Conjuchem is working on novel chemistry platforms for in-vivo bioconjucation, or simply put an injectable delivery system,
primarily for pain relief, that will eliminate the addiction, sedation, and cardiorespiratory depression that accompanies the
administration of opiates to a patient.


DuFresne said the challenge for Conjuchem and the sector is to manage momentum, a lot of which is coming from happy
investors.

But unlike the biotech boom of late 1995 and 1996, the companies that are seeing their stocks surge, or those waiting in the
wings, are of a much higher caliber, said DuFresne.

And although investors are smiling and chief executives are grinning, everybody is asking when biotech's moment in the sun will
come crashing to an end.

To all the doomsayers, William Slattery, senior healthcare analyst at Amerindo Investment Advisors Inc. said ''Stop
complaining and enjoy the ride.''