Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (93650)	2/16/2000 8:24:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571808

Re: "Then Grove interjected "so the implication is that later silicon will be faster." Yu said "yes, next revisions of Si"....the implications of that exchange were very clear." This is not possible PB. I've already been exposed as an imbecile for suggesting such a thing. In addition Scumbria says it's not possible, just like the nonsense about 3GHz isn't possible either. Who you gonna believe? Intel or Scumbria? EP

To: Process Boy who wrote (93650)	2/16/2000 10:12:00 PM
From: Goutam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571808

PB, re:This makes sense. There has been no speed path work on the Willy Si that was shown at the demo. Also, the front end of the P858 process will incrementally improve over time. Geez. The Register can even screw up a face to face interview. Thanks, but my question was regarding the Elmer's assertion that Power Point presentation was run on Willamett based system. >I believe they probably were misinterpreted. What was misinterpreted? Were you referring to the claim of "PPPresentation was done on Willamett", or something else? Regards, Goutama