Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (93800)	2/17/2000 3:04:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Respond to of 1571177

hmlay - <.. So you allowed me (sorry Kap)and others to think Kap was going bonkers over semantics. You must feel proud of yourself.> I don't feel sorry for him in the slightest. He knew what the game was at the end of that exchange. He had to put up, or shut up. He put up, and he was wrong. He thought he had proprietary information that was good. His folly. PB

To: hmaly who wrote (93800)	2/17/2000 3:31:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571177

hmaly, both PB and Kap are at fault here. Kap should never have known about the split-frequency core in the first place, much less go yappin' off about it on this thread. And this thread is full of people who will take the info the wrong way, just like Kap did when he assumed the worst instead of the best. PB is also at fault here for even answering Kap. This is because PB couldn't have denied it without looking like a liar later on, nor could he have affirmed it, thereby compromising confidentiality. It just amazes me, however, to think that you guys are rushing to pat Kap on the back for knowing about Willamette's split-frequency core. Sure, he knew (so did Chuck), but he was dead wrong in his conclusions regarding Willamette's base clock speeds. And I'm sure he got at least some of you to assume the worst as well. Tenchusatsu