Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nihil who wrote (11402)	2/17/2000 7:09:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769667

Apart from anything else, what site?

To: nihil who wrote (11402)	2/17/2000 3:18:00 PM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

nihil, The cocaine rumors about Bush are from a book written by a man who was convicted of attempted murder, can not or will not name his sources, can offer absolutely no proof of his allegations, and in an interview on 60 minutes showed himself to be unreliable as an author of even fiction. The "scull and bones" thing is some sort of club connected with Yale students, that is trying to be as oddball as the lampoon club at Harvard. The only ones that circulate the ominous rumors of scullduggery, are those that are not invited to join. You are well known on all of the threads you visit, to be one who makes outlandish statements in order to foment some sort of argument, and friction. In other words, you are an intentional agitator and, as far as I am concerned, are not welcome here, or anywhere else for that matter. ~H~

To: nihil who wrote (11402)	2/17/2000 3:30:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I just realized that you were referring to the Bush site itself. I misunderstood and thought that you had forgotten to source your allegations. Pardon......No one believes that Skull and Bones is a satanic cult. It is just a Yale club with a mystique......Haqihana is right, the coke charge never caught a tail wind because the source was so deeply compromised......In any event, the charges are so outlandish, I do not feel obliged to "convincingly refute them". The onus is on others to establish the credibility of them......