SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (93838)2/17/2000 11:09:00 AM
From: Epinephrine  Respond to of 1571355
 
RE: <The gist of it was that different functions on one chip can run at different speeds. You guys acted like this was crazy when you knew all along he was right. >

I agree, I don't remember the responses to Kap being directed at his speed estimates but rather at his basic assertion that different parts of the Willamette would clock at different speeds regardless of what speeds those were. I remember posts saying things along the lines of clock is clock etc. Kap was right about his major assertion, period. and I am sorry for thinking that he was off the deep end myself.

Epinephrine



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (93838)2/17/2000 2:17:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1571355
 
That was irrelevant. The gist of it was that different functions on one chip can run at different speeds. You guys acted like this was crazy when you knew all along he was right. Your credibility seems self serving...I'm rather dissappointed...

Jim, I am surprised at your apparent surprise...PB's and Tench's particular bias and loyalty always been very clear..at least to me.

ted