SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Francisco Gold - FGX.V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (648)2/17/2000 7:38:00 PM
From: James N. Wilson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1907
 
<I thought they were going to drill or do something deeper than trenching>

Wayne, think first more trenching, sampling then fast track exploration and development.

I was able to steal(I'm not proud) a few shares awhile back when some investors were bailing out. It seemed to me the stock was undervalued on merits of El Sauzal and cash in bank. Almost fell out of the chair when the Marlin news came out.

If more stunning trenching results think it might be off to the races for FGX.

james



To: TheBusDriver who wrote (648)2/17/2000 9:51:00 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1907
 
Forget about the drilling, we don't know if the first round of assays is real or not as the property hasn't been sampled by a third party at this time. Nobody outside the company has corroborated the samples. What if they are off by a factor of 10 or so? After all 100 meteres of 8 to g/tns Au is a bit on the unusual side isn't it. Wasn't that about the values that Golden Rule published?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News