SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff Fox who wrote (93854)2/17/2000 1:08:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583681
 
Jeff,

re:RDRAM"

I agree with your points that next generation will be less bleeding edge.

IMHO if they had gone to 32 bits instead of 16 bit busses RDRAM would have been a major winner.

200Mhz data rates (400Mhz when double pumped) would have been less of a manufacturing yield leap.

In addition where RDRAM does show a real advantage it is with dual channels ie with 840 and now willy.

Now RDRAM may succeed by mid next year if they are lucky.

But if it dies Intel will pay a BIG price.

regards,

KAsh


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News