Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rr_burns who wrote (6449)	2/18/2000 11:56:00 PM
From: Scott C. Lemon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Hello rr, > I think you need to examine your understanding of the > specifications. The 11a spec takes you to 54 Mbps... I had actually tried to state that I was not aware of the 802.11a standard nor details. I've been using 2Mbps 802.11 for about 2 years now, and have been following the 802.11b 11Mbps stuff ... I'll be interested to read more about the 11a stuff that you refer to ... > I frankly don't follow the intellectual property view that you were > discussing. ( I don't understand exactly what you guys were > saying). I commented on another post ... my main issue is that when companies decide to mix patents and standards it usually becomes a mess and everyone loses ... including consumers ... > The economic world does work well on the basis of core intellectual > property being cheaply shared. This, I believe ... it's how markets are "grown" and lots of people benefit from that growth ... > The bollinger bands are relevant because they define standards of > deviation from a trailing price. QCOM went out the sidedoor a month > or so ago... So I'm not sure that I understand much about TA and the lingo ... are you saying the QCOM is taking a hit due to something that occurred? > If the logic of patents holds no weight for you, perhaps the > associative synchronicity of these events will catch your eye. Can you explain a little more about what you are seeing related to this? Scott C. Lemon