Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Superconductor Technologies : SCON -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SEAN007 who wrote (313)	2/18/2000 9:06:00 AM
From: adsorb	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 903

Who the heck is this guy ? Get an idea from a simple exercise: check the number of entries of "Superconducting Technologies" in Northernlight.com check "Conductus" check "Illinois Superconductor" check "American Superconductor" check "Intermagnetics General" check "pluvia securities" check "Hambrecht and Quist" check "Hmabrecht & Quist", ... Here are the results SCON:945; CDTS:2135; ISCO:925; AMSC:1745; IMG:1181 H and Q:2246; H & Q:53686 and "pluvia secutities" a grand total of 1 - today's excrement". IMHO wouldn't give this guy a second look. He's so incompetent he wants a slo-mo movie rerun of the last 2 days so he can wake up, or worse yet, short (strangle) an excellent technology in its infancy.

To: SEAN007 who wrote (313)	2/18/2000 9:24:00 AM
From: Wafa SHIHABI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 903

I don't know how much following Pluvia have or who they are. But, it is clear from their recommendation that they are totally unaware of the superconductor story and its evolution or are purposely ignoring it. The closing lines: "Pluvia Securities Research, their agents, associates, and or employees have investment positions consistent with the above-stated investment opinion. " say it all. Nonetheless, if their following is large enough and if there is a coordinated short attack, their above closing lines may become a self fulfilling prophecy (and a huge revisit to buying opportunities for those who believe in SC). Even then, I would like to see how they support their 6 month target price. 15 is no where in the charts or fundamentals. I would probably understand a target of 4 or even 2.5 (if the SC story does not pan out). My own long term target is in triple digits. Its a free market out there.