To: mact who wrote (8089 ) 2/19/2000 2:23:00 AM From: jack bittner Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12623
the best article i've seen contrasting corvis and qtera's technologies for 2500mi or so without regeneration is by stephen hardy in lightwave:lw.pennwellnet.com (the rest of this url is: 1&KEYWORD=nortel%20) "...primary difference between the way the two companies approach optical networking lies where the restoration functions reside. qtera's revolves around a single platform that can provide terminal multiplexing, optical amplification, add/drop capabilities, and interconnection functionality ... IN ESSENCE, THE DWDM DEVICE HOSTS THE RESTORATION FUNCTIONS. (emphasis mine)" " ... we use the optical-interconnect devices for wavelength provisioning, not for restoration ... this enables very scalable architecture ... you (don't have to) scale the cross-connect on a port by port basis ... the terabit routers are interfaced directly into a survivable photonic platform, AND THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO NETWORK DEVICES THAT YOU WOULD NEED (emphasis added). and within that context we are providing the survivable photonic transport piece of this puzzle. ... as you make the cost of bandwidth very very low by the elimination of optoelectronic regeneration, the simplest architectures that provide the fastest restoration, such as ... in our case the optical 1+1 schemes ... really economical. and nobody will dispute the performance advantages you get from a simple 1+1 scheme,because all restoration decisions are made locally." " ... corvis favors the use of an optical switch IN THE NETWORK CORE (my emphasis) ... its Corvis Optical Network Gateway, the Corvis add/drop multiplexer and the Corvis Optical Router. the product line is designed to aid in the evolution from a Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) ring architecture to one more conducive to very high speed ... until you get a mesh architecture, a lot of the restoration function is done from the end points, from the terminal sites, similar to ... SONET ... today. ... the restoration will change as the network evolves from path-diverse point to point, to a full mesh network." Qwest is testing both of them, and so far speaks well of both. it seems to me that qtera's architecture is far simpler, with fewer components, and science drives toward simplicity.