SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike M2 who wrote (40666)2/18/2000 5:04:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 99985
 
SEC could turn e-tailers' paper profits into losses
by Judy Mathewson
Bloomberg News

WASHINGTON - The Securities and Exchange Commission
may make Amazon.com and other Internet retailers change their
accounting practices in a way that could cut "gross profit" figures,
considered an important indicator of business potential.

The SEC is questioning Amazon.com, eToys and others about
how they account for the cost of distribution centers where goods
are stored and packaged for delivery. So-called fulfillment costs
aren't now counted when these Web retailers calculate gross
profit - a measure of the company's sales minus the cost of selling.

The SEC has told companies it may make them count some
distribution expenses as a "cost of sales," subtracting them before
arriving at the gross profit number on financial statements,
Amazon.com said in a filing. That change could turn gross profits
into multimillion-dollar gross losses.

Amazon.com, eToys and other Web retailers now put fulfillment
costs in the category of sales and marketing expenses, which
aren't included among costs that go into the gross profit
calculation.

Shifting the fulfillment costs to a different line on financial
statements wouldn't have any effect on a company's sales, or on
its net profit or net loss.

Few Web retailers actually turn a bottom-line net profit, though.
Because of that, investors and analysts may look to the gross
profit figure as an indicator of the health of the company's basic
business operations.

Steven Schoch, eToys' chief financial officer, said it won't make a
big difference if the SEC requires a bookkeeping change.

"It's strictly a presentational matter," he said.

According to estimates in an SEC filing, Seattle-based
Amazon.com spent about $107 million on fulfillment in the fourth
quarter of 1999, about 60 percent its reported marketing and
sales expenses. If all those distribution expenses were labeled as
costs of sales instead of marketing expenditures, Amazon.com's
$88 million gross profit for 1999's fourth quarter would turn into
an almost $20 million loss.

Analysts also look at a company's gross margin, which shows the
percentage of sales that were counted as gross profit. In
Amazon.com's case, the change being considered by the SEC
would have cut its fourth-quarter gross margin to a minus-3
percent, from 13 percent, said David Zale, a senior Internet
analyst at Sands Brothers & Co.

"That's a big swing," he said.

Earlier this month Amazon said it expected its gross margin, as
now calculated, to "approach 20 percent" in the first quarter of
this year and to continue increasing.

Amazon spokeswoman Patty Smith declined comment on the
change but said "the accounting method we're using is standard
among retailers online and traditional brick and mortar retailers."

Kevin Silverman, an ABN Amro analyst, agreed.

"It's always been that way," Silverman said. "How you get the
product to the customer has always been a (marketing) expense."



To: Mike M2 who wrote (40666)2/18/2000 5:25:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
thanks Mike, i know the site. Gail Dudack (who incidentally sounds a bit bearish most of the time) yesterday said :'the people who call this a bubble don't know what they are talking about'
maybe she should take a look at the crosscurrents site...helps one to put things in perspective, eh?