SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RocketMan who wrote (67505)2/18/2000 9:04:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 152472
 
It is as though even Congress is fearful of the Chairman's power
I think even Congress is aware of Greenspan's lack of power. He has one tiny tool to control the enormous U.S. economy. In truth, Congress does not question him hard becase they do not want to expose the fact that there is little he or they can do. Perception is all they have, too many questions and they will lose that.
TP



To: RocketMan who wrote (67505)2/18/2000 9:48:00 PM
From: Boplicity  Respond to of 152472
 
I can't disagree with what you are saying. But if you think like the FED does, the gradualist approach is the correct path. One of the consequences of what the Fed is up to are the market swings we are having. The market is speaking to us. The market knows that the we are in sea change, and there is money to made on picking who will benefit from this change, but it also knows the higher rates are bad, at least that the old accepted view when applied to the old economy. The problem with raising interest rates is that the high-tech industry, which is largely responsible for the our new economy and where the greatest gains are to be found, will not be bothered by higher rates as much as the old economy. Another problem the FED will run into as it tries to slow the market advance, is that the market is providing capital in the form of increasing market capitalization, this new paper money is increasingly being used to build and mold the new economy. Maybe the above is why he says he doesn't know what money is anymore? <g> He is stuck, and he knows it he can't plunge the market into a extended down turn. Frankly I wish he would just leave it alone. But since the alternative is the Fed reduce margin rates, or worse an increase in capital gains taxes. Both of the above actions would be insane, and surely would halt the market in it's track and blow the tires right out from under the new economy right when it is being defined. When you get right down to it and look at the dynamics of our economy and how the Internet and our increasingly connected world is changing our collective lives, the economy is way beyond what the FED can control so all and all I really don't see as much risk as you do.

greg



To: RocketMan who wrote (67505)2/18/2000 11:08:00 PM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Rocket, I'm not sure you have read the below on the JDSU thread, but here is another posters thought on what you and I have been posting about. very well thought out and much easier to read then my feeble attempts.


Message 12917533

You might not too far off in your thinking, I have to ponder you action some more this weekend. The problem is that it will take a long time before the FED can slow the market down, high-tech wise for sure as I outlined, they might very well blow it by then. I would hate to see a long drawn out sideways market come out of it all.. That is more scary then a down market. NO action means no way to make bucks. BONDS would be the only ans! It's been a long time since I clipped a coupon. <g>

greg