SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nihil who wrote (99502)2/18/2000 11:32:00 PM
From: rudedog  Respond to of 186894
 
nihil -
re: (1) Dell's (and white box makers) destruction of CPQ, IBM etc. margins and profits.

In 2000, it is CPQ who is destroying DELLs margins and revenues by cutting the ASP of the commercial desktop in half. CPQ is currently at a billion dollar run rate on iPaq, which is a $499 commercial desktop based on 500MHz celeron (with a slightly higher priced PIII also available). In other words, CPQ thinks they are on plan to sell 2 million iPaqs. I have done a fair amount of discussion on this topic on the DELL board... DELL will have no choice but to follow in that space or risk losing revenue and share to CPQ. At the moment DELL enjoys a commercial desktop ASP of more than $1600... if 20% of those products go to $500, what does DELL have to do in unit volume to make up the revenue? And if net margins on those products are 4%, what does that do to overall DELL margins?

For CPQ, of course, a 4% net margin would be a big improvement over their current negative net margins...

From Intel's perspective, that works just fine - the OEMs have a big incentive to drive more units, the boxes still contain Intel processors and chipsets...

and re: Any school boy can put together a cheaper computer than he can buy at CompUSA
There is no way an individual can get even the parts for the price of an iPaq - it takes commitments on components in the millions to get pricing to make a product like that work... and then the individual needs to spend $200 for Win2K at retail. Go out and get your best price if you think I'm kidding about that. 500MHz celeron, 64MB RAM, 4.3gb disk, CD ROM, Motherboard with USB, video, 10/100 ethernet, power supply, case and trimmings, keyboard and mouse for $300? You can maybe get the parts in a bag for that if you really know how to scrounge, or you can get a fully integrated working unit with Win2K and a bunch of applications installed, and a warranty... which makes more sense?



To: nihil who wrote (99502)2/19/2000 12:28:00 AM
From: Gerald Walls  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Any school boy can put together a cheaper computer than he can buy at CompUSA.

Eh, I don't think so. Much better for not much more, but not cheaper. You can buy a cheap-ass computer for next to nothing these days, but it is cheap-ass. I saw one that while it did have a 10/100 NIC, video, sound and modem in the motherboard it had one shared PCI/ISA slot.

A non-upgrade version of Windows ain't cheap either. Of course, one could use Linux.