Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (34350)	2/19/2000 4:39:00 PM
From: tombet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Brian, Thanks for the post on TSCM. Personally, I'm glad I paid my $125 for a lifetime membership here than $10 a month at TSCM. Although I only follow the AMAT thread religiously, I do like to look around at other message boards and seem to trust what is written here than anywhere else. I find it kind of funny that I spend so much time reading the AMAT posts. Since I bought into this stock about 2 1/2 years ago(post'97 split) I have decided this will be my core long-term holding. My goal is to sell a little AMAT at a time starting around 2006. Hopefully I will add to this position when AMAT retreats a little. Sorry for rambling-Tom

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (34350)	2/19/2000 4:41:00 PM
From: Terry D	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

That is a terribly researched article. How about all the spam? Anyone factor that nonsense in to the post count? 350 posts on the Yahoo CMGI thread - 348 of which said either "YEE-HAW!"; "do you think the next tick will be plus or minus"; "Trader Pete is a homo" or was a spam for some penny stock board. I owned Flycast and now CMGI after the buy out - and I wouldn't trade SI for 10 Yahoos or Raging Bulls.