Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Can you beat 50% per month? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (2706)	2/20/2000 3:24:00 PM
From: Joseph F. Hubel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19256

I really don't understand your quest for the high road. Your credibility is as much in question as anyone's. Your blaming misconduct on "depression" is no different than an alcohol abuser blaming his addiction on his childhood. That's a bunch of 90's crap. The drunk controls whether he picks up the drink and you controlled whether you took employment payments while also drawing disability checks. As far as I'm concerned all "analists" have the same thing in common... "The quest for Money & Recognition". I will never believe you never owned a stock prior to slamming it. I know Jon has been over zealous in his self promotion, however he has not limited his picks to "pennies". Though I have not played his picks other than by an occasional coincidence, I have followed his stock picking and it has certainly been better on average than the wiz boys and girls at the major brokerage houses, and for that matter better than most mutual funds that can't even beat the S&P. As I see it, you are no different than any of the above, you just take an opposing direction on your picks. You have no more patent on the moral high ground than anyone else trying to capitalize on a perceived talent in order to make a buck. Get off the soap box, this is not Times Square. JFH