SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kash johal who wrote (94348)2/20/2000 2:09:00 PM
From: Dan3  Respond to of 1576881
 
Re: We live in an asynchronous world and such systems get tested thoroughly all the time

Good point, though it was fun to try to conceptualize race conditions inside the ALU and bus-snooping units as voltage and temperature varied (and beyond me, at least).

On the other hand, thoroughly testing the 820/840 chipsets seems to have been presenting something of a challenge, for one reason or another.

Elmer could easily rebut your comment by saying "Oh yeah? Then why can't Intel design a qualifying test for the 820/840?", but I don't think he will. <VBG>

Even when using the MTH, I believe Rambus's asynchronous bus is in the loop (it's been such a terrific, robust design so far, I can't understand why everyone isn't just ecstatic about having to pay royalties for it). Could there be more to this issue than meets the eye?

Regards,

Dan



To: kash johal who wrote (94348)2/20/2000 2:19:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576881
 
Kash,

We live in an asynchronous world and such systems get tested thoroughly all the time.

It is not clear to me how you do affordable production test on a design without synchronous scannable storage elements. Could you elaborate?

Scumbria