Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (51940)	2/20/2000 6:41:00 PM
From: If only I'd held	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

This is a whole new game. The on-line investing boom has just gotten started in my opinion. As long as there are millions upon millions of baby-boomers bringing in paychecks without having any bills to pay, money will conitinue to pour into the market. It's gotta go somewhere, and everywhere else just plain looks boring. I see DOW 20,000 within the next 2 years myself. And the Nasdaq at 10k....no problem. I'm not ready to go bearish just yet. Buy on the dip, and buy on the dip, and buy on the dip. When them baby-boomers start retiring, and dropping off, and they are left with social security and meager pensions, be short. We have time to party for a while though. As far as the traditional "bear" market.....well, we'll never see that type of thing again. We will most definitely see a huge drop in valuations, (someday) but the volatility will always be there. Things will move, and opportunities will present themselves.....not like the old days where stocks just sat around doing nothing all day for months and years on end. This party will probably last another 10 years. Not without it's ups and downs of course though. The Goldman Sachs thing will probably cause us to run out of beer for a little while though. Happy Trading

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (51940)	2/20/2000 10:47:00 PM
From: BlondePsyDoc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

You're correct in your general statement's about turds. Their nature will, at some point, be perceived and there's the crux. An analogous statement might be that "cream always raises to top". However where it pertains to human perception, cream is clearly defined, and as such, not open to much contradiction. But turds lack for this same clarity and therefore may take a lot longer to identify as such. Were this not the case, your job would be a lot easier...wouldn't it? All this aside, did you fully receive the CNRS em? If so, I am quite curious as to you interpretation of it. Hopefully, we've established, that even though I am not a member of your subscription site, and for reason of personal style will never be, I assume as I given, you understood that I have a great deal of respect for what you do otherwise I would not have contacted you with this. Now, it's just a matter of simple curiousity as to your perspective on it. Here we go with perspectives again...oh well. I think mine are correct, I still would like to know yours.