Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (74826)	2/21/2000 10:52:00 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

OK this is the way I see it: Neocon's definition of relativist- you can do anything you want, belief is founded on nothing, but you don't have to believe that your belief is founded on nothing to be a relativist. X's definition- belief is founded on nothing, all beliefs are founded on nothing (including your own) AND you must believe THIS to be a relativist- it ISN'T ok to believe your own belief is better, and still be a relativist. We are defining relativism differently- I say you have to believe in relativism in order to be one (as much as a relativist can believe in anything) and you seem to be saying that a relativist need not believe in relativism to be one.