Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joey Smith who wrote (94663)	2/22/2000 9:20:00 PM
From: niceguy767	Respond to of 1575784

Joey: Show me the product at retail, Joey...AMD is gaining market share by the day at retail...If Athlon demand is so-so, funny that management has stated that Q1 revenues will be greater than record breaking Q4 revenues...The only so-so demand I'm aware of is for the scarce supply of PweeIII 733's and 800's... Hey Joey, tell us what you think AMD Q1 ASP will be in Q1...If it's any help, it was $80 in Q4...Hey Joey...higher, the same, or lower...(Minimum $90, maybe even $100 is my estimate, Joey)...Tell us yours! or are you just FUDDING?

To: Joey Smith who wrote (94663)	2/22/2000 9:32:00 PM
From: Epinephrine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575784

RE: <many short-term issues that should worry you more than Willy.> Joey, Willamette was not one of my short term concerns, Willamette was my long term concern, that was my whole point. AMD's long term prospects sure look better after the revision to Ace's article which literally halved the execution horsepower estimate of Willamette. I agree there are short term concerns but short term concerns can be evaluated and re-evaluated on a daily basis, it was the long term concerns that worried me, and I think that they are what worry analysts as well. The long term concerns such as Willamette are what analysts really focus on since they determine whether AMD becomes a decent investment worthy of institutional holding or remains a trading stock. In my opinion those concerns are greatly mitigated by the information in Ace's article because, I agree with you, that Intel has not shown all it's cards but CPUs are not magic and if a CPU only has a certain amount of instruction processing horsepower architecturally then there is no tweaking or features in the world that will get it above a certain performance level. In other words Intel may not have shown all it's cards but if Willamette really does only have a single issue FPU then Intel has shown a club and a spade and I know that it cannot have a straight royal flush. That changes the whole nature of the game. Thanks, Epinephrine