SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Duke of URLĀ© who wrote (38360)2/22/2000 11:59:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Respond to of 74651
 
In order to have "The Rule of Law," the law must be interpreted and applied to the facts. That's the role of the judicial system, which is hard at work in the case of DOJ vs. Microsoft. The judge isn't making his determination on the basis of nastiness, but on the basis of the evidence, the law, and legal precedent. There's nothing knee-jerk about it; both sides have had ample opportunity to present their cases.

Private property isn't absolute. It interplays with a variety of other legal principles, including antitrust law. Comprende?



To: The Duke of URLĀ© who wrote (38360)2/23/2000 12:20:00 AM
From: miraje  Respond to of 74651
 
it was Apple that tried to control windows.

Pretty funny, actually. AAPL ripped the GUI from PARC. If they had been a little less greedy and a little smarter, they would have ported their OS to the x86 platform a long time ago and would probably now be the dominant software company. Jobs wanted the whole shebang, hardware and proprietary software, kinda like McNealy and SUNW today, despite his "open source" posturing with Solaris and Java.

-JB