Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SRU-ASE : STARFIELD RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: winston.s.c who wrote (789)	2/23/2000 8:54:00 AM
From: chick in NC	Respond to of 1239

winston: I don't imagine there's any way to tell, except to go look. We'll have that answer by mid-summer. The biggest hope is for a reachable concentration on the property, one that's wide enough to make mining feasible. Also, since the company plans to add some exploratory holes in the south area, perhaps there's even more ore to be found. Should be an interesting spring. y'all take car.

To: winston.s.c who wrote (789)	2/23/2000 8:29:00 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1239

This is good property as it has proven that it has a lot of metal in the system. Its location is a problem. I don't understand the complexity of the geology and ore controls to predict what combination of events that create the conditions for a small tonnage of high grade which would accelerate payback. As it stands there are many holes in this prospect and many samples. It's going to take something special to get the average grade to the threshold I've indicated. But maybe I'm wrong about the need to have US$230+/tn ore to make this a mine. Comments?