Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David E. Taylor who wrote (39687)	2/23/2000 11:42:00 AM
From: LakesideTrader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45548

Thanks for posting the HWP/A distribution info which closely parallels the COMS/PALM deal. I had seen that but couldn't find it again when I went to look. That info should ease the minds of many COMS holders.

To: David E. Taylor who wrote (39687)	2/23/2000 12:46:00 PM
From: KevRupert	Respond to of 45548

Thanks David. That definately clears up that issue. Your research is greatly appreciated! advalorem

To: David E. Taylor who wrote (39687)	2/24/2000 3:35:00 AM
From: telebob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45548

COMS valuation after PALM spinoff: Dave, good to see thinking people on here. Its interesting to note that the valuation of HWP after the Agilent spinoff increased ,almost exactly, by the amount of the valuation of agilent at the agilent trading price on ipo day. $44 x 380 million Agilent sharesowned by hwp = $16.7 billion hwp went up 19 points in two days; x 1 billion shares of hwp outstanding= $19 billion. my point is that not much discount is given to the value of the spinoff in the stock of the parent company when its known that shareholders will get the rest soon.