Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (94812)	2/23/2000 4:36:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574845

Re: "Intel has 12 fabs running all out at 100% percent capacity (with no yield or binsplit problems according to you or PB) against puny AMD's one fab running at 80% capacity" 2 Fabs hmaly. One at 80% and the other at 0%. Re: "Now who is clueless?" Obviously you.

To: hmaly who wrote (94812)	2/23/2000 4:49:00 PM
From: L. Adam Latham	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574845

hmaly: Re: According to SEC filings for 4q-99, Intel grossed 8,212 million dollars in rev. AMD grossed 954 million dollars. A ratio of 8.6 to one; however Intel has over 50 times the capitalization. Intel has 12 fabs running all out at 100% percent capacity (with no yield or binsplit problems according to you or PB) against puny AMD's one fab running at 80% capacity, and yet Intel could only gross 8.6 times the money. Now who is clueless? Seems you are fond of statistics. How about this one: 1999 Net Income --------------- Intel $7,300,000,000 AMD ($89,000,000) Adam