Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Infowave Wireless Messaging IW:TSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Gordon who wrote (1354)	2/24/2000 1:42:00 AM
From: axial	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1690

Hi, Tom, and all - The fascinating thing about all this circumstantial evidence that bothers us all so much is that it could be wrong - and yet,there it is... Why did IW move to Redmond? Why not Blaine, or Seattle, or Bellingham? Would have been a lot cheaper and easier. What's with Seybold? What justifies his steadfast support of a microcap Canadian stock as a takeover target, when 95% of the analysts in the States haven't even heard of Infowave? Why was Infowave so (quietly) happy when Schultz replaced Major? Does anyone out there seriously believe that Infowave is going to list on NASDAQ naked? No news, no announcements, nothing to catch the interest of potential US investors? My previous post, speculating on a collaboration with MS on voice-recognition software was just that - speculation. But I'm sure as hell they're collaborating on something. My point: it defies logic that all the clues I've mentioned in my posts mean squat, and that Infowave is heading to NASDAQ with nothing but an outstretched hand. I do not believe they will repeat the disaster of their last PP. There's more, much more. There has to be.