Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oblomov who wrote (12174)	2/23/2000 5:40:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

taunts are a good thing -- we need more <ng> Naz still has a shot at 5,000 (maybe 4850 or so) before the end ... BWDIK

To: Oblomov who wrote (12174)	2/23/2000 6:08:00 PM
From: David Smith	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42523

"Anemic" rally? The Nasdaq hitting new highs every week on historic, sustained heavy volume, with participating sectors expanding to include some that have been in the dustbin for years, like biotechs? "Anemic" rally, just as the Russell is picking itself off the mat after years of underperformance...something that's generally seen early in the business cycle and not the end...? What's your definition of a "broad" rally? When was the last time you saw one? If the Dow returns to new highs next month, led by a few large caps like GE, will you dismiss it and call it "narrow?" There are always strong stocks, and there are always weak stocks...it's called a market, and avoiding the weak stocks and being in strong ones is the name of the game. Flippantly dismissing each consecutive market high as "anemic" is NOT being in the game.