Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NickSE who wrote (12226)	2/23/2000 7:04:00 PM
From: David Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42523

And what percentage of last year's gains were also attributable to a relatively small number of stocks? And the year before that? And the year before that? Bears are fond of saying that people making money in this market are mindless, and they bemoan the confusing of brains with a bull market. The argument does not make sense; if the market strength is so narrow and breadth so poor, then by definition it cannot be a healthy bull market. You can't have it both ways, so which is it? A healthy bull market in which clowns are successful only because a rising tide lifts all boats, or a stealth bear market in which the "clowns" are actually smarter than the bears and those on this thread because they seek out the strong sectors and stocks....? Don't you get it? Market breadth is ALWAYS bad if you're not in the sectors and stocks that are going up.