Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (50555)	2/23/2000 9:20:00 PM
From: Richard Gibbons	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

Larry, MU's historical stock price and stock chart is nothing but historical data. So, continuing your parallel, using MU charts to predict MU is like driving a car looking out the rear view mirror. (I don't mean to be disrespectful, since I've followed this board for 3 or 4 years, and I've really enjoyed your posts, and your web site. But I think the DRAM prices are useful information and I think it's relevant MU material to post, just as your MU TA is.) Richard

To: TREND1 who wrote (50555)	2/24/2000 4:22:00 PM
From: Steve Robinett	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

--Larry If you would actually read and remember other people's posts(for example, this one, siliconinvestor.com might notice that I agree with the notion that MU's stock price leads DRAM prices. Unlike TA gurus, I even give suggested reasons for the effect. As for driving with one's eyes on the rearview mirror, trendlines, probability projections, support and resistance lines--all the simple-minded little tools of technical analysis--are based on 100% pure historical data, including one-minute price charts of MU. That seems to me the ultimate in driving with your eyes on the rearview mirror. Best --Steve