SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (94862)2/23/2000 10:17:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1575328
 
RE:"Gee...maybe we will get to SEE Merced systems BEFORE athLOSS systems !"

Well, Paul did say "maybe". <G>

Jim



To: Scumbria who wrote (94862)2/23/2000 11:10:00 PM
From: crazyoldman  Respond to of 1575328
 
Hello Scumbria,

Re: Here is a classic Paul post

It's amazing what can be found in the boneyard of dead messages.

Kindest regards,
CrazyMan



To: Scumbria who wrote (94862)2/23/2000 11:48:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575328
 
SCUMbria - Here are Two Classic ScumBria Posts !

{================================================}
To: kash johal (90628 )
From: Scumbria Monday, Jan 31 2000 2:46PM ET
Reply # 90632 of 90664

Kash,
It will indeed be impressive if Willy see's first silicon shortly and reaches production by Q3 2000 at speeds > 1Ghz as alleged.
The chances of that happening are pretty close to zero.
Scumbria

{================================================}
To: Elmer (91275 )
From: Scumbria Thursday, Feb 3 2000 10:44AM ET
Reply # 91279 of 91454

Elmer,
I closed out all of my AMD position this morning. Willy has me spooked.
Scumbria
{================================================}

Paul



To: Scumbria who wrote (94862)2/24/2000 11:08:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 1575328
 
Scumbria, I've been following the Merced saga for a long time, it's almost more amusing than the Rambus saga. Certainly, the delays are even more astounding, very unlike Intel in general. Originally due to ship in '97, according to an old Microprocessor Reports article I recall. Similar to Rambus, it's something nobody but Intel could pull off.

I liked the Register's Itanic variation on Itanium, but they don't use it anymore.

Cheers, Dan.