Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buffettology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LauA who wrote (2192)	2/24/2000 12:11:00 AM
From: jhg_in_kc	Respond to of 4691

<<. A troglodyte, a catamite>> my goodness, how you resent my taking a profit. I will look up these archaic words in my OED, and get back to you. peace jhg

To: LauA who wrote (2192)	2/24/2000 1:24:00 AM
From: Michael Burry	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4691

This board sorely needs to move on - and that goes for everyone, myself included. Buffett stocks in the traditional sense are literally littering the floor of the market right now. Coke's at 50 and nobody's mentioning it (although I don't like it, I know some here do) . My Liz Claiborne post went unchallenged. It is truly a time to be buying Buffett-like stocks, IMO. We have the SEC telling Buffett, "No, you're not that influential anymore" and we have the lone bastion of Buffettology on the net distracted or something. Let's get the idea chain going again. Has anyone looked at Intimate Brands as a Buffett-like stock potential? It is hard to imagine their version of ultra-soft skin mag ever going out of style, and they're earning some 40% on capital. Mike