Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oblomov who wrote (12292)	2/24/2000 8:00:00 AM
From: bill meehan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42523

Andrew, why do you bother to respond? <ng>

To: Oblomov who wrote (12292)	2/24/2000 1:06:00 PM
From: Jumper	Respond to of 42523

>>60% long Nasdaq...Up more than 3% yesterday<< If you're so smart Mr. Clown you would have been 180% long and made 9% yesterday -g-

To: Oblomov who wrote (12292)	2/24/2000 2:35:00 PM
From: BGR	Respond to of 42523

Andrew, If you disagree with anyone's posts, why not limit your criticism to their posts and not expand it to include their motive? That, as Mohan so eloquently put in the thread header, is probably the mark of a clown. And I know that you are no clown. -BGR. PS: BTW, if a professional investor underperforms the market for a long time, they deserve to lose their jobs indeed! Tht holds true in all other fields of work. Why is investment banking special?