Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (12363)	2/24/2000 11:26:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

That may not be a bad idea.........

To: gao seng who wrote (12363)	2/24/2000 11:51:00 AM
From: garydmedia	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Are you kidding? Find real evidence for a "God" in the universe and a researcher will be DROWNED in money! First, probably from religious organizations but then from every conceivable source! But -- it has to be REAL evidence! By this I mean the SAME kind of evidence you would have to find to demonstrate that light does not travel at 186K miles per second, or for a new theory of why the dinosaurs died off, or that "cold fusion" can really work. Not some kind of "faith", not just arcane pseudo-reasoning but real evidence -- something that can be detected and measured and reproduced by other scientists, working independently. It is the religious people, not the scientists, who filter out any evidence that does not fit their atavistic theories of the universe. This notion that scientists would reject actual evidence of a god is nothing but more propaganda put out by the quick-buck artists of the God Business.