Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oblomov who wrote (12450)	2/24/2000 1:11:00 PM
From: Lucretius	Respond to of 42523

yea, i was thinking the closing low....

To: Oblomov who wrote (12450)	2/26/2000 8:38:00 AM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

The economist also noticed that had the changes not been made to the DOW -- it would have been under the 10,000 mark a couple of weeks ago >>The Dow itself reached its January high only because it had been made more high-tech last November when the likes of Microsoft and Intel replaced such old-economy shares as Chevron and Union Carbide, even though the first two are traded on Nasdaq, not the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Without those changes, it would have fallen below 10,000 on February 11th, when the official (rejigged) index actually stood at 10,425. <<