Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (11197)	2/24/2000 7:44:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

>>>Ask PartyTime>>> Jon, again, I don't want to make a major production of going back and forth with you on EDIG. The facts of Zulu are the facts of Zulu. Then I was a rookie investor and thought the notion of television-quality advertising on the Internet made sense and could be a profitable investment. That the company hired executives from Disney, DEC, Pixar, Barnes & Noble, Texas Instruments, etc., bought what was then market leader to Doubleclick and initially got glowing reviews in Wired and other journals made Zulu seem very promising. I staked out my position. When Wired did a 180-degree turnaround things went bad. It was after the Wired piece that you showed up to heap venom on Zulu. Eventually, I wrote some negative posts and this prompted the founder of the company to contact me. That I got snookered by those communications and the combination of all of the above are the facts. All you did was argue what you always argue: your distaste for penny stocks. I agree with the poster who previously wrote that taking apart penny stocks is really not that big a deal. However, EDIG is not a company spawned from a failed OTC shell. EDIG, as Norris, once produced viable products while a Nasdaq stock. I know this from my historical experience as a transcriber, transcribing ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, legal, medical, academic and business documents. Indeed, I was then aware of the equipment necessary to do this kind of work. Norris was a name then. EDIG went into R&D, its revenues slipped and Nasdaq strengthened its listing requirements. In the process, EDIG slipped onto the OTC. Its Nasdaq reinstatement documents are presently pending. It's a whole 'nother situation. Jon, EDIG is not Zulu. So asking PartyTime does not apply with respect to EDIG. Now, could you and I share agreement regarding the majority of other penny stocks? Yes, we could. EDIG is very close to an important next step: Nasdaq. Why not set back and wait for developments. Better yet, as I've suggested, visit some of EDIG's technical folks who are now working on the products which you, yourself, are uncertain of. You've written several times about credibility. Well, perhaps you could add some credibility to your remarks were you to make such a visit to the company. Go for it. What's the harm in doing so?