Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (38513)	2/24/2000 9:55:00 PM
From: Jon Stept	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

John- re: "Should a man plead to a lesser... included charge when he is not guilty of any wrong doing for the sake of expediency?" Ideally, never. Good point. Thanx for the link. I have looked over some of the documents... compelling. Have you read the DOJ's documents in this case too? Each side is going after different definitions of "tying" and other key actions in this case. One side looks to the recent Appeals Court, one uses cases from years ago... Have you been following this from the beginning? Thank you. In my opinion. Jon :)