SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buffettology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (2204)2/24/2000 9:53:00 PM
From: Michael Burry  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 4691
 
jhg, I for one am willing to listent to tech stock ideas as potential Buffett plays. I think I caught heck from this thread for suggesting Apple had Buffett-like qualities and that I had just taken a position. Oracle is another of mine that caused me grief among my fellow value investors - although each has since tripled at the least.

All I want for this thread is a solid idea followed by solid reasoning - along Buffett's way of thinking. There has to be, in my mind, some evidence that a tech stock can withstand and evolve before it can be considered a Buffett stock. Microsoft, IMO, is not a Buffett stock because it has yet to show me it can evolve. It is very possible to me that a new operating system can evolve to destroy a lot of what Microsoft has worked for. Sure, they have some nice online properties, but those are losing money hand over fist. I think it can be argued that Intel, Apple, and Oracle and even Compaq have shown a resilience over time that Microsoft, Dell, and Cisco have not. I wonder if you can see where I'm coming from.

In any case, when looking at Buffett-like tech stocks, I'd want to stay away from the absolute biggest names unless they are under some severe stress.

Good investing,
Mike



To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (2204)2/25/2000 12:55:00 AM
From: James Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4691
 
jhg, I was about to do the IGNORE button on you then you come through with something like that.

<<If this trend continues, more and more money leaves Buffett-like stocks and goes into already fully valued tech stocks until you have, tulipmania in techs and a bear market crash in non-techs. That is the logical endgame.>>

You're not the only one concerned - but look at what you've been saying for the last year, drawing the conclusion that this is an indefinite trend. Now you sound like you are worried to.

I like what Alan Greenspan said about a month ago, quoting Herb Stein: "If something cannot continue it will end." Thats what keeps me staying the course.

There is a very simple answer for those with profits in the high-flyers. Start a plan to methodically sell them. I wish I had your problems.