SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (34422)2/25/2000 9:34:00 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
Chip capacity is so tight 'overshooting' isn't likely in 2000
By J. Robert Lineback
Semiconductor Business News
(02/25/00, 09:03:50 AM EDT)

SAN JOSE -- The chip industry's most advanced wafer fabs were nearly tapped out at the start of 2000, and it now appears unlikely that semiconductor manufacturers will significantly overshoot demand by adding too much new production capacity this year. However, some industry analysts are concerned about 2001, if capital spending continues to accelerate into next year, and if interest rates keep rising.

This week, the Semiconductor Industry Association released new statistics showing just how tight wafer fab capacity was in the fourth quarter of 1999. The report said worldwide fab utilization was at 93.6% of capacity in the fourth quarter--the highest level since the start of the last semiconductor downturn four years ago. Capacity utilization was the highest for 0.3-micron and below MOS integrated circuits, which reached 97.6% at the end of 1999.

"This is incredible considering the big jumps in wafer starts," observed analyst Bill McClean, president of IC Insights Inc. in Scottsdale, Ariz. "This shows the industry is flat out sold out."

The new Semiconductor International Capacity Statistics (SICAS) shows all MOS wafer fabs were operating at 94.3% of their capacity in the fourth quarter last year vs. 91.5% in the third quarter 1999 and 82.9% in the fourth quarter 1998. Bipolar wafer fab utilization was also at a four-year high at 88.8% in the fourth quarter vs. 86.3% in the third quarter of 1999 and 74.1% in the fourth quarter of 1998, according to the SICAS report.

Chip makers processed 517,100 eight-inch equivalent MOS wafers a week during the fourth quarter, an 8% increase over the third quarter when metal-oxide semiconductor fabs were starting 479,900 wafers a week, the report said. Fourth quarter MOS wafer starts last year were 17% higher than in the same period in 1998, the SICAS report said.

The sharpest increase in wafer starts occurred in the 0.3-micron and below category. The SICAS report shows those wafer starts increasing 29% to 461,900 a week in the fourth quarter compared to 358,100 a week in the third quarter.

After delaying major investments for new production capacity last year, chip manufacturers are increasing their capital spending budgets. Last week, Applied Materials Inc. announced it had increased its industry forecast for wafer fab equipment revenues to 46% from its previous estimate of 19% (see Feb. 16 story). And now some market research firms are also beginning to increase their capital spending forecasts as well.

"Everywhere you look, people are saying orders are coming in very strong, and we are now in the process of upgrading our forecast to 42% from 29% at the start of the year," said Risto Puhakka, vice president of operations at VLSI Research Inc., a semiconductor capital equipment research firm based in San Jose. "The foundries have certainly put a stake in the ground, and they are now responding to the huge demand."

Pure-play foundries are attempting to use the current recovery cycle to greatly expand their business with large semiconductor houses, which historically fabricated most if not all of their wafers. Many of these integrated device manufacturers (IDMs) began shifting their wafer fabrication strategies toward third-party foundries as a way to reduce expenses and risk in 1998 and 1999, but now concerns are rising about the availability of capacity.

"The goal of the foundry companies is to convince the IDMs to not build that next fab," noted IC Insights' McClean, who is now expecting a 43% increase in capital spending among chip makers this year. When expenses for "brick and mortar" are taken out, McClean believes the capital spending on production equipment could be up 50% to nearly $40 billion in 2000 vs. $26.4 billion in 1999.

"Wow, here we go again," said McClean, referring to historical trends of overspending in boom times, which eventually contributes to the next downturn. McClean believes the chip industry could absorb a 50% increase in tool spending this year if IC revenues grow at 25-30% in 2000.

"The year we have to be watching is 2001 if the increase in capital spending repeats another 50% increase," he warned.

Currently, huge spending increases are somewhat isolated, McClean said. For example, silicon foundry giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSMC) now plans to increase its capital spending to $4.7 billion in 2000 from $1.7 billion 1999 (see Feb. 24 story). At that level, the world's largest silicon foundry company might end up spending more money on new capacity than Intel Corp., which has earmarked $5 billion for total capital expenditures--including non-semiconductor activities.

Europe's STMicroelectronics is also one of the more aggressive spending with plans to increase its capital expenditures by 63% to $2.2 billion from $1.4 billion, noted McClean. Several others are also increasing capital spending budgets by more than 50% in 2000. "We must watch Samsung, Micron, Hyundai, Infineon and others... if everyone jumps on the bandwagon, then we'll have problems," he said.

So far, recession-battered DRAM makers have been more cautious than foundries or other IC suppliers. Micron Technology Inc., for example, is increasing capital spending by 36% to $1.2 billion in 2000 from $900 million, McClean noted. Currently, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. is increasing capital spending by just 33% to $2.4 billion in 2000 from $1.8 billion last year.

The only market segment that appears to be at risk of overshooting demand is flash memory, said McClean. "That market is setting up to be a very hot business this year again after last year's shortages. Suppliers will probably not catch up with demand this year, but there are some big companies seriously chasing the business--Intel, Hyundai, STMicro, NEC, Mitsubishi, AMD and others," he noted. "Flash is ripe for overshooting."



To: Tony Viola who wrote (34422)2/25/2000 5:42:00 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 70976
 
Buyers benefit as DRAM prices head south
By Jack Robertson
Electronic Buyers' News
(02/25/00, 04:38:12 PM EDT)

Hold on tight: DRAM prices are plummeting again.

A survey of aftermarket resellers indicates that spot-market prices are threatening to crash through the $4 level, bringing glad tidings to OEM buyers and countervailing grief and potential financial misfortune to DRAM suppliers.Mainstay 8X8 PC100 64-Mbit SDRAMs were listing on the spot market for as little as $4.50 this week, with no end to the free fall in sight, according to observers. OEM contract prices took a dive as well, although 64-Mbit PC100 parts have generally not dipped much below $6, sources said.

In a scene all too familiar to the industry's memory-IC vendors, the trend could eventually carry DRAM prices below manufacturing costs, according to Victor de Dios, an analyst at de Dios & Associates, Newark, Calif.

“There's just too much inventory in the channel that must be burned off before prices bottom out,” de Dios said. “The major DRAM manufacturers have reduced their production costs to under $4 [for 64-Mbit SDRAMs]. That's where they'll hit their pain threshold and [will] have to cut production to stop the pricing free fall.”

A spokeswoman for Micron Technology Inc., Boise, Idaho, said the memory-chip maker “is cautious right now” in its assessment of the DRAM market. “We don't have enough data yet to judge how long the downturn will continue and when prices will turn around,” she said.

Bob Eminian, vice president of marketing at Samsung Semiconductor Inc., San Jose, said the company is sitting on less than two weeks of inventory, but warned that some DRAM makers “have four to six weeks of inventory on hand. We won't see any turnaround until that inventory is depleted.”

Eminian estimated that it will take until the second quarter before some balance is restored to the supply/demand equation.

Observers pointed to several factors flattening DRAM prices just months after OEM buyers were spending more than $20 for 64-Mbit chips on the spot market.

For de Dios, the reason for the collapse is obvious: “There's no big demand, and supply continues to escalate. “The scarcity of [Intel] processors caused the white-box PC manufacturers to ship fewer units than they planned,” reducing their demand for DRAM, de Dios added. However, he believes major PC OEMs were able to get the processor supply they needed from Intel, with their slackened DRAM orders a result of the traditional first-half PC slowdown.

Some contend OEMs are disposing of large excess stocks that accumulated when Y2K supply disruptions failed to materialize. Jonathan Joseph, an analyst at Salomon Smith Barney Inc., San Francisco, added that DRAM demand increased in 1998 and early 1999 when PC makers doubled the amount of memory shipping in their low-end systems from 32 to 64 Mbytes. With another doubling in the large, low-cost market unlikely in the near future, DRAM demand has fallen into a trough, he said.

Whatever the root cause, Joseph said DRAM bit growth is continuing to slow in the global market. Citing Semiconductor Industry Association figures, he noted that bit consumption in the fourth quarter of 1999 was up only 39% year-over-year, less than half the eight-year average of 81%.

The SIA refused to release fourth-quarter figures for DRAM bit consumption, but said growth for the year increased by 76%. However, Salomon Smith Barney analyst Scott Decker said growth slowed significantly in the second half of 1999 in what he called “a disturbing trend.”

SIA figures furnished by Salomon Smith Barney appear to bear this out. DRAM bit consumption in the first half of 1999 averaged 86%, but tailed off to 51.5% in the remaining two quarters. This compares with 1998, when growth in the first half of the year averaged 74%, but then jumped to 95% in the second half.

Despite what they believe will be soft demand early this year, most analysts and DRAM executives expect seasonal factors to cause bit growth to rebound in the second half, when the PC industry ramps up for back-to-school and holiday sales.

Plummeting DRAM prices may set up the next big boost in PC-memory density as OEMs are once again enticed by low chip costs into raising the DRAM content of their sub-$1,000 PCs to 128 Mbytes.

“There's a self-correcting action here,” Eminian said. “And once PC memory [size] moves to a higher level, it tends to stay there.”