SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (12104)2/25/2000 9:29:00 AM
From: Wally Mastroly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
A "Stern" warning from the Fed guy via rubber chicken outlet:

dailynews.yahoo.com

Major Rate Move Possible - Fed Official

PLYMOUTH, Minn. (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve may be heading toward a ''significant'' move to raise interest rates but it will make the changes in gradual steps, Minneapolis Fed President Gary Stern said Thursday.

Stern's comments provided further evidence that Fed policymakers think they may need to raise rates substantially in the coming months to slow the robust U.S. economy and keep inflation from taking off.

''It is quite possible that over time, a significant change in policy might be implemented, albeit on a gradual basis,'' Stern told the Plymouth Rotary Club.

The U.S. central bank has already raised the key federal funds rate on overnight lending between banks four times since June, bringing the rate from 4.75 percent at the start of the credit tightening to 5.75 percent currently.

Wall Street is now bracing for more rate hikes in the coming months and top Fed officials have not been bashful about warning that they will continue to act until the rapid-fire pace of domestic demand slows.

Fed chairman Alan Greenspan said in testimony to U.S. lawmakers this week that there was little evidence the rate hikes so far were slowing the economy to a pace the Fed feels comfortable with.

He made clear that he thought the rate of growth in the second half of last year -- nearly six percent on an annual basis -- could not be sustained without generating inflation.

Both Stern and St. Louis Fed President William Poole, who spoke at a separate event at Saint Louis University, said they did not see a threat to the economy from broader inflation as a result of higher oil prices.

Growing world demand for oil, and not production cutbacks, was the driving force pushing prices up, Poole said. But despite oil prices, inflation was benign in January, he added.

Poole said tight monetary policy that keeps inflation under wraps will keep interest rates lower in the long run, and he dismissed the notion that higher interest rates depress economic activity.

Both Stern and Poole are non-voting members of the Fed's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee this year.

One of the Fed's preoccupations these days is that a tremendous run-up in stock prices in the past few years has created a ''wealth effect'' where consumers spend more as their paper wealth grows.

Fed officials fear wealth effect spending is fueling demand in excess of supply in the U.S. economy and this imbalance could trigger inflation.

But Poole said it was not clear the U.S. stock market is overvalued and it was hard to say what implications any fluctuation in stock prices would have for Fed policy.

''It's not obvious the stock market is overvalued. I don't know what the right price for the stock market is,'' Poole said.

''There is so much uncertainty about the stock market that increases or decreases in the stock market do not in any way drive me...to believe that there should be any easy or quick (monetary) policy conclusions that would flow from it.''

The Dow Jones industrial average, the key U.S. blue-chip stock index, has seen a bout of weakness so far this year, even while technology stocks on the Nasdaq composite have been soaring to eye-popping record highs.

Stern said it was too early to draw any conclusions about the impact of the Dow's decline on the broader economy. ''I don't think the decline we have had is enough to matter quantitatively, because you could reach different conclusions.''

By the close of trade on Thursday, the Dow was down more than 12 percent since the start of the year while the Nasdaq was up about 13.5 percent.



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (12104)2/25/2000 10:00:00 AM
From: Investor2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15132
 
RE: "08:33 Q4 GOVERNMENT SPENDING UP 9.2%"

Talk about throwing fuel on the fire....

Best wishes,

I2



To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (12104)2/25/2000 10:47:00 AM
From: Alan Bell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
re: 4Q GDP- numbers all higher than expected: Q4 GDP REVISED TO 6.9%, HIGHEST IN 12 YEARS

Last weekend, wasn't Bob concerned that this might come in at the consensus number of 6.1% and that would be substantially higher (and problematic) growth?

How can the market apparently shrug off this number?

-- Alan