SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (95184)2/25/2000 5:40:00 PM
From: Epinephrine  Respond to of 1573638
 
RE: <AMD has been claiming that for FAR longer than Intel has been telling you CuMine is coming. You don't believe Intel yet you lap up anything AMD says?>

First, I don't think that I have ever discounted your claims that Coppermines are coming. They might not be but I wouldn't be surprised if they were, In fact I would be very surprised if they didn't come soon, for Intel's sake they had better.

Second, I know that AMD has had many false starts in many areas of their business but my point was that it is put up or shut up time now and they will either get Dresden on line or they won't and then we will know. I think they will, for AMD's sake they had better.

Thanks,

Epinephrine



To: Elmer who wrote (95184)2/25/2000 5:50:00 PM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573638
 
Elmer re...<<<AMD has been claiming that for FAR longer than Intel has been telling you CuMine is coming. You don't believe Intel yet you lap up anything AMD says? >>>>>>

Elmer , I thought it normally took less time to build a coppermine as opposed to a superfab or is Intel's process slower than we thought.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News