SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (727)2/26/2000 1:29:00 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
The AOL rationale is absurd. Merck has a Merck-like valuation for a reason. Ditto with Pfizer, Novartis, etc. Pharmaceuticals reach market at very high margin. There is a limited number of patients, and an even more limited number of diseases.

The overall size of the "medicines" market will increase markedly as new-science molecules role out. No question. Markets will become more fragmented and drug lifespans will decrease. No brainer. All of these factors favor biotechs. The growth potential is enormous.

However, analysts are reaching for retirement this year, and lotsa orphans and grandmas are going to be left hurting.

Totally irresponsible.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (727)3/5/2000 1:50:00 PM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 52153
 
Barron's interview with a hedge fund manager who owns some genomics stocks:

interactive.wsj.com

About Nycomed Amersham (NYE), he says:

"British firm has billions of unrealized value through its 55% stake in genomics company"