SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wolf speed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Walliker who wrote (2294)2/26/2000 12:42:00 PM
From: slacker711  Respond to of 10713
 
Thought this might be of some interest....talks about cell-phones transitioning to white LED's. However a new technology might elimanate the need for backlighting. Most of the rest of the article is on the voltage requirements in cell-phones.

Message 12982204

First, growing demand for color displays is forcing a move away from using green or amber LEDs for backlights and toward white LEDs,
Bell said. Because white LEDs have a much higher forward voltage, 4 V compared with 1.8 or 2 V for conventional LEDs, they need a
step-up converter where none was needed before.

Additionally, color LCDs run off a higher contrast-bias voltage, "up in the 9-V range, and once again requiring a boost converter," he
said.

A wild card in the cell-phone-display game is the emerging technology of organic electroluminescent (EL) displays, which produce
color, operate at a lower voltage than the 9 V for color LCDs, and preclude the need for a backlight, thus saving power.

"Everyone is waiting to see if organic EL displays take off," said Bill Edmiston, semiconductor product manager at Toko America Inc.,
Mt. Prospect, Ill. If so, cell-phone power requirements will change once again.

(Where conventional monochrome EL displays are used as display or keypad back- lights in cellular phones and PDAs, they command
their own type of high-voltage AC-driver chips, a specialty of companies such as IMP Inc., San Jose.)



To: John Walliker who wrote (2294)2/27/2000 12:38:00 AM
From: James Hutton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10713
 
John,

Thanks. That helps.

Jon