To: Earlie who wrote (76619 ) 2/26/2000 2:44:00 PM From: Zeev Hed Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
Earlie, I am not sure if RMBS is a $15 to $20 stock, but it has reached what I considered last November a high (I had $37.5 for the low, if further delays of the 820 were to occur and $222 for the high, it reached $224), after two gravestone doji last week, it might even be ripe for a major retrenchment. To get down to $15, you'll have to assume PE contractions to the neighborhood of 15/20 of 2001 earnings, since even under a worse case scenario, they should be able to approach a buck in 2001. I do not think that PE contractions of this magnitude occur at once, the whole market will have to undergo few cycles of bear moves followed by bull moves in which process PE ratio in general, and thus RMBS' PR as well will contract to more rational levels. Of course, a bearish stand at current levels (that are twice what they were when we had this discussion just few short weeks ago) is much easier to justify in face of the high valuation and some of the uncertainties, yet, if I was inclined to short, I would wait for either a confirmation that $224 is a top (running up there without making a new high), or a break under at least $170. As a betting man, I still think that there are better shorts out there (VBG). The action of INTC's stock tells me that they have their .18 micron problems under control as well as their problems with Athlon. Somehow, I expected AMD to breach into new high territory in the last two weeks (and suggested to a cyberfriend to cover their short if such a breach occurred, maybe a bad advice, since AMD failed to achieve a breakout), the fact that it did not, indicates to me that in their battle with INTC, they have a way to go (INTC buries them with their manufacturing capacity and with recent announcements of additional Cap Ex to both increase capacity and improve technology in existing fabs). As I stated before the bullish case for RMBS is based strongly on the fact that INTC needs them as much as they need INTC, until this thesis is negated, or RMBS' price discount earning more than four years out, I remain generally bullish (yet not "buy, hold and forget it) on RMBS. By the way, do you think that the recent suit against Hitachi might have had an effect on the recent run? As far as I can determine the use of both rise and decay in each pulse to double clock rates is well covered in RMBS' patents and I am not sure how the DDR guys are going to go around that if RMBS pushes the issue once the Hitachi trial is concluded in their favor (it it is). Zeev