To: LiPolymer who wrote (52132 ) 2/27/2000 1:20:00 AM From: Kevin Podsiadlik Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
First of all, what I said was not at all wrong. The short interest figures you were quoting were indeed five weeks out of date. Secondly, I have no clue who fisherking is, and I probably wouldn't care if I did. I don't know why he'd be excited over a high short interest if he were short himself, anyway.So, if the short interest actually did increase between the ODP and February 10th, what does this forbode? I don't know, six more weeks of pointless stock touting? Evidently Lehman put the screws to you guys a little harder than I thought. I kinda hoped for a nice low number that might shock you back into reality but apparently that wasn't in the cards. So, fine. Believe what you must. Pretend in your mind that I and most of the others on this thread haven't long since covered but in fact have pressed our bets. Pretend Anthony didn't send a one-line message containing at least four typos to his subscribers on 1/31/00, with SNRS hovering at $7.50 a share, announcing that he was covering his short position in SNRS so as to move the money on to other causes whose collapses (or explosions, as the case may be) were more imminent. Since then I've had far and away the best trading month I've ever had, thanks in no small part to Anthony and company, while in the meantime you have been sitting on your rather stagnant SNRS shares and waiting for... Godot? I'll tell you what, I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt on the short interest number, make of it whatever the hell you want to, I don't care anymore. Write us if you get SNRS to 15 or VLNC to 50, otherwise don't bother.